Subject: Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequences From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:28:25 +0300 |
> There is an arbitrary number of sequences, sometimes containing items > with the same name: > > (k, o, p, c, f) > (d, e, f, g) > (k, f, z, o) > (a, b, c, d) > > I want to create a master sequence which contains every item once, > preserving the original order.
Doesn't xsl:for-each-group over combined sequence solves the problem?
No, it puts groups in order of first appearance, which would put f before d.
How this is different from proposed solution: (a, b, k, o, p, c, d, e, f, z, g) where o appears before z?
Whether the answer should contain a minimal number of inconsistencies? -- Vladimir Nesterovsky http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Müller-Hille | Thread | RE: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Wolfgang Laun |
Month |