RE: [xsl] Ordered union of sequences

Subject: RE: [xsl] Ordered union of sequences
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:51:56 +0100

> How this is different from proposed solution:
> (a, b, k, o, p, c, d, e, f, z, g)
> where o appears before z?
> 

Perhaps I misunderstood the requirement. It needs to be more clearly stated.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequences, (continued) Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 8 Apr 2010 16:08:13 -0000 Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 8 Apr 2010 16:22:56 -0000 Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 8 Apr 2010 22:26:27 -0000 Vladimir Nesterovsky - 8 Apr 2010 15:29:15 -0000 Michael Kay - 8 Apr 2010 15:52:16 -0000 <= Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 8 Apr 2010 15:52:33 -0000 Wolfgang Laun - 8 Apr 2010 15:46:11 -0000 Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 8 Apr 2010 16:01:45 -0000 Michael Kay - 8 Apr 2010 16:02:11 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequences, (continued)
- Wolfgang Laun - 8 Apr 2010 15:46:11 -0000
  - Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 8 Apr 2010 16:01:45 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 8 Apr 2010 16:02:11 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Vladimir Nesterovsky	Thread	Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Müller-Hille
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Müller-Hille	Date	Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Müller-Hille
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home