Subject: Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:50:54 -0700 |
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Not "many", all uses of for-each can be equivalently handled >> by apply-templates. >> > > Only if the select expression selects nodes (rather than atomic values). But > XSLT 2.1 will remove this remaining difference. Wow... This is great! > > Regards, > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > http://twitter.com/michaelhkay > > -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] RE: Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Costello, Roger L. |
Month |