Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: First public working draft of XSLT 2.1 From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:48:20 +0100 |
On Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:10 +0300 "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I understand your concerns but feel that you may be forgetting many > > very useful use cases > I understand that there will be use cases almost for any feature, > whatever. Going back to XSL, pre xslt, IIRC it was the introduction of eval that caused the uproar which had quite a few consequences. It was universally disliked, and I'm surprised the WG have raised it again. Or perhaps the group has had a full turnover. Probably on the mulberrytech archive somewhere. regards -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: First public working draf, Vladimir Nesterovsky | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: First public working , Michael Kay |
[xsl] Re: First public working draf, Vladimir Nesterovsky | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: First public working , Michael Kay |
Month |