Subject: Re: [xsl] Two recommendations: (1) Call it XSLT "program" (not XSLT "stylesheet"), (2) stop treating XSLT as an acronym From: ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 00:01:03 -0400 |
Cheers, ac
I thought the distinction were:From: Kendall Shaw [mailto:kshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 03:18 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Two recommendations: (1) Call it XSLT "program" (not XSLT "stylesheet"), (2) stop treating XSLT as an acronym
XSLT is not a general purpose language. There are sometimes reasons to
make a distinction between languages like XSLT and languages like
Haskell, say.
Haskell = functional programming language Java = general purpose programming language Logo = domain specific programming language XSLT = functional programming language
References <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative_programming> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General-purpose_programming_language>
Andy.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Two recommendations: (1) , List Owner | Thread | [xsl] Re: Peter Desjardins convert , Hoskins & Gretton |
Re: [xsl] Two recommendations: (1) , List Owner | Date | [xsl] question on paths, Monosij Dutta-Roy |
Month |