Subject: Re: [xsl] question about generate-id() From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:41:53 +0100 |
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 17:56:59 +0100 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I don't follow your argument, Dave. An input document's > >> identifiers have *no* relationship to generate-id(). > >> > > Lets agree to differ on that one then Ken. > > > > > > Well, Ken is saying what the spec says, and Dave is saying what he > would like it to say instead, and it's not logically inconsistent > that these two things should be different. > > There are certainly use cases where a function generate-new-id() > specified as Dave would like might be useful. You could code it like > this: Yet another kludge Mike. IMHO the definition (English) is wrong. I'll leave it at that. -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] question about generate-i, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] question about generate-i, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] [XPath 1.0] Why is .[A] i, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] question about generate-i, Michael Kay |
Month |