Subject: Re: [xsl] Best way of testing Hexadecimal value [xslt 1.0] From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:57:24 +0530 |
in the code fragment I posted, I would propose the following change, you may use: <xsl:value-of select="false()" /> & <xsl:value-of select="true()" /> instead of <xsl:value-of select="'false'" /> <xsl:value-of select="'true'" /> This didn't struck me earlier :) Regarding XSLT 2.0 vs 1.0, IMHO I would say the 2.0 version is much better by design and increases programmer productivity considerably. Here's a little anecdotal evidence: I like this style of writing in 2.0 <xsl:variable name="x" select="fn:findSomething()" /> over <xsl:variable name="x"> <xsl:call-template name="findSomething" /> </xsl:variable> in 1.0 On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM, <pankaj.c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yet another fine sample. > >>If you can, I encourage to move to a 2.0 environment (unless you are >>programming for a browser) :) > > I personally always use and prefer 2.0 but for this particular case I've > been asked to use 1.0. Some people still prefer old technologies over > latest ones :-) > > > Thanks anyway. > > Pankaj -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Best way of testing Hexad, pankaj . c | Thread | Re: [xsl] Best way of testing Hexad, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Best way of testing Hexad, pankaj . c | Date | Re: [xsl] Good quality XSLT course , pankaj . c |
Month |