Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes

Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes
From: Evan Lenz <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:40:44 -0800

On 11/10/10 1:16 AM, Michael Kay wrote:

Priority +0.5 is used for everything else: typically, but not exclusively, when the pattern includes filters or constraints on the node's ancestory.

A rule I find easy to remember is that a pattern has the highest default priority (0.5) if and only if it contains a "/", "//", or "[..]"

Evan
--
Evan Lenz
Lenz Consulting Group, Inc.
http://lenzconsulting.com
+1 (360) 297-0087

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes, (continued) Andriy Gerasika - 8 Nov 2010 22:16:46 -0000 Brandon Ibach - 10 Nov 2010 07:04:33 -0000 Michael Kay - 10 Nov 2010 09:17:07 -0000 Brandon Ibach - 10 Nov 2010 13:37:54 -0000 Evan Lenz - 12 Nov 2010 02:41:01 -0000 <= Wendell Piez - 12 Nov 2010 17:55:35 -0000 Message not available Evan Lenz - 13 Nov 2010 07:19:12 -0000 G. Ken Holman - 13 Nov 2010 12:59:03 -0000 Evan Lenz - 16 Nov 2010 15:10:26 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Brandon Ibach	Thread	Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] Sorting using more than v, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-	Date	[xsl] Re: Unable to View the XSL Ou, Rashi Bhardwaj
	Month