Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes From: Evan Lenz <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:18:54 -0800 |
At 09:40 PM 11/11/2010, you wrote:The lowest-priority patterns are special in that you can exhaustively enumerate them all.A rule I find easy to remember is that a pattern has the highest default priority (0.5) if and only if it contains a "/", "//", or "[..]"
Hm. So does it have the lowest if and only if it doesn't have any of these, or ":" (indicating a namespace prefix), but it does have "*" or "()"? (indicating a wildcard or kind test?)
For XSLT 1.0, I created a table listing these: http://lenzconsulting.com/how-xslt-works/#priority
-- Evan Lenz Lenz Consulting Group, Inc. http://lenzconsulting.com +1 (360) 297-0087
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] removing crlf character w, Brandon Ibach | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, G. Ken Holman |
Month |