Subject: RE: [xsl] Issue with Xalan nodeset From: "Etheridge, Stephen" <stephen.etheridge@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:12:10 +0000 |
Thanks Martin I was coming to that conclusion............. Kind regards Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Martin Honnen [mailto:Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx] Sent: 28 November 2010 17:51 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Issue with Xalan nodeset Etheridge, Stephen wrote: > Making the change suggested makes no difference to the output apart from > the inclusion of the standard XML PI -<?xml etc.) If xsl:copy-of does not output anything then I don't think Xalan has a received a parameter type it treats as a result tree fragment you could then apply the node-set function to. I think David is right that you did not provide something as the parameter that Xalan treats as a tree but rather as a string value. -- Martin Honnen http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/ Think green - keep it on the screen. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Issue with Xalan nodeset, Martin Honnen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Issue with Xalan nodeset, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Limitations of including/, pankaj . c | Date | Re: [xsl] current month xslt 1.0, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |