Subject: Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces From: Brandon Ibach <brandon.ibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:15:02 -0400 |
Andre, There are many issues, here, but let's just focus on one, for the moment. Can you describe in some more detail the idea of hierarchical namespaces that you've mentioned a few times, how you think they might work and what the benefits might be over existing namespace features and/or alternative solutions? -Brandon :) On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:42 AM, ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > than binary, for example, I also proposed enhancing namespace support, > especially for efficiency and possible hierarchical namespaces.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Another Example [Was: Namespa, Geert Bormans | Thread | Re: [xsl] Another Example [Was: Nam, ac |
Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Na, ac | Date | Re: [xsl] Another Example [Was: Nam, ac |
Month |