Subject: Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:06:13 +0200 |
In other words, if I don't immediately output the results of xsl:copy, then memory consumption grows and grows. Yes?
Potentially yes. But not really because of the xsl:copy, if you changed it to xsl:sequence you'd probably get the same behaviour. If you are using lots of variables and don't want them to take up space, you need to have a very good idea how your xslt processor's optimiser works and constrain your usage to uses which the optimiser can optimise away....
-- google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. | Thread | RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. |
RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. | Date | RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. |
Month |