Subject: Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:38:39 +0200 |
But if there are recursive references then that approach causes the program goes into an infinite loop.
-- google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. | Date | Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Michael Kay |
Month |