Subject: Re: [xsl] position last and attributes From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:45:17 +0100 |
On 20 September 2012 07:13, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would seem (somewhat paradoxically) that given the definition of > position() and last() they could be applied to @* which is > intrinsically unordered. Understanding position() and last() is key area of understand how xslt works... they don't return the position of nodes in the input document, but in the list of nodes selected to process. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] position last and attributes, Ihe Onwuka | Thread | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka |
Re: [xsl] RE: XSL-FO and Z-index, Jesper Tverskov | Date | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka |
Month |