Subject: Re: [xsl] position last and attributes From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:51:25 +0100 |
thats the genus of the paradox I was referring to. On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20 September 2012 07:13, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It would seem (somewhat paradoxically) that given the definition of >> position() and last() they could be applied to @* which is >> intrinsically unordered. > > Understanding position() and last() is key area of understand how xslt > works... they don't return the position of nodes in the input > document, but in the list of nodes selected to process. > > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch |
Month |