Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors? From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:54:08 +0100 |
David, I've got access to a poll tool ... feel free to forward me questions offlist and I will setup. unsure what you going on about insulting terms/delineation e.g. was it age ? nontechie versus techie ? perhaps its because I dont live in UK/USA for almost a decade and losing my 'correctness' chip ???? J On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:23 AM, davep <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Slightly different tack. > > <guesses> > If we have 100 people in the world using XSLT. How many > are restricted to XSLT 1.0 for some reason. > How many require 2.0 for technical capability and use its features > regularly. > Have decided to move to 3.0 because.... > > I looked at free survey tools, they mainly restrict to < 100 entries. > Pointless? > > If anyone has access to such a tool it would make for an interesting set of > results, > more so with well thought out questions lacking bias. > > Agreed 3.0 is CR, but my guess is that users will look at it and perhaps use > fringe > content, but the number using it seriously? Of my 100 users, perhaps 2. > I shan't use Jims rather insulting terms to delineate users. > > If 2.0 is currently drawing 10 or 20 users I'd be surprised. > IMHO 3.0 has rolled 180 degrees from the one man xslt 1.0 effort and is now > the > proverbial horse designed by committee. > > </guesses> > > DaveP
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, davep | Thread | Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, davep |
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Adam Retter |
Month |