Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?
From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:27:08 +0000 (GMT)

Michael Sokolov wrote:

  Hi,

> a centralized service like CXAN get adopted
in a real way could
> spark an explosion of interest and activity.

  Yes, I
think the library offer is a crucial point for the adoption
of a language. 
The biggest problem I've seen for such a system is to
have enough users to
attract library developers, and enough libraries
to attract users...

Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?, (continued) Adam Retter - 27 Jan 2013 21:02:54 -0000 Florent Georges - 30 Jan 2013 01:11:49 -0000 James Fuller - 30 Jan 2013 08:06:43 -0000 Graydon - 28 Jan 2013 03:22:39 -0000 Florent Georges - 30 Jan 2013 01:27:20 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 27 Jan 2013 13:03:11 -0000 davep - 27 Jan 2013 16:02:56 -0000 Andrew Welch - 27 Jan 2013 16:09:42 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 27 Jan 2013 17:54:25 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Graydon	Thread	Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Florent Georges	Date	Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, James Fuller
	Month