Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?
From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:09:34 +0000

>> If you have specific criticisms of the XSLT 3.0 effort, I'd love to hear
>> them.
>
>
> My prime one is complexity MIke?

The complexity might make it harder for implementors, but the reverse
is true from a user's perspective.  Look at grouping or string
processing in 2.0 vs 1.0....



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?, (continued) Adam Retter - 27 Jan 2013 21:02:54 -0000 Graydon - 28 Jan 2013 03:22:39 -0000 Michael Kay - 27 Jan 2013 13:03:11 -0000 davep - 27 Jan 2013 16:02:56 -0000 Andrew Welch - 27 Jan 2013 16:09:42 -0000 <= Dimitre Novatchev - 27 Jan 2013 17:54:25 -0000 Liam R E Quin - 28 Jan 2013 05:24:47 -0000 davep - 28 Jan 2013 08:07:26 -0000 Michael Kay - 28 Jan 2013 09:03:52 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, davep	Thread	Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, davep	Date	Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Dimitre Novatchev
	Month