Subject: Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predicates in patterns|
From: David Rudel <fwqhgads@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:05:28 +0200
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) <abel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Then, to make it tricky, what happens here, if the applied set is //foo? > (foo) > > I did not find that well-defined in the spec or in Michael Kay's XSLT > 2.0 Programmer's Reference book. I agree (though I could be wrong) with everything you had up until the above. Kay does deal with this topic. See the section on "Filter Expressions." Best, David -- "A false conclusion, once arrived at and widely accepted is not dislodged easily, and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously it is held." - Cantor's Law of Preservation of Ignorance.