Subject: Re: [xsl] Numeric toplevel predicates in patterns From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:32:34 +0100 
"Sibling numerical predicate" isn't one of your defined terms. I assume you mean a predicate of [1] preceded by another numerical predicate.
I thought it would be clear from the definitions of sibling predicates and numerical predicates. But indeed, I meant a numerical predicate that is also a sibling predicate, that has the effective static numeric value of 1 (the integer, not the string), such like
Current Thread 


< Previous  Index  Next > 

Re: [xsl] Numeric toplevel predica, Abel Braaksma (Exsel  Thread  Re: [xsl] Numeric toplevel predica, Abel Braaksma (Exsel 
Re: [xsl] Numeric toplevel predica, Dimitre Novatchev  Date  Re: [xsl] Numeric toplevel predica, Abel Braaksma (Exsel 
Month 