Subject: Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and === From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 16:04:56 -0000 |
For XML Schema 1.0: "Definitive XML Schema" by Priscilla Walmsley. On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bridger Dyson-Smith bdysonsmith@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michael Kay's XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 (for XML, XSLT, and XPath) is some of > the best money I've ever spent on XML-technology-related documentation -- it > is a fantastic piece of work. Mulberry Technologies [1] have an assortment > of print resources available on their website. Ken Holman's Practical > Transformation with XSLT and XPath is another excellent reference [2]. Sal > Mangano's XSLT Cookbook has come in handy for me at various times. > > Priscilla Walmsley's XQuery (for XQuery) is a very good introduction to the > language. > > I'm not sure about a schema reference; the W3 may be a good place to start > [3]. > > While it is not a book, Dmitri Novatchev's XSLT/XPath training course on > Pluralsite is another absolutely excellent resource. > > HTH, > Bridger > > [1] http://www.mulberrytech.com/ > [2] http://www.cranesoftwrights.com/training/index.htm#ptux > [3] http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema > > > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:22 AM, L2L 2L emanuelallen@xxxxxxxxxxx > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> .... Anyone know of any good books to read that concentrate mainly on >> teaching xml, xslt, schema, xQuery, and xPath? >> >> E-S4L >> >> > On Aug 2, 2014, at 10:03 AM, "Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx" >> > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > To provide you with some unconstrained feedback, I'd like to let you >> > know that >> > >> > (1) proposals to changes to programming languages are best made during >> > their development phase, and for XPath and XQuery, that's over (until a >> > next revision, if any); >> > >> > (2) the least you can do is to spell the language(s) correctly, moreover >> > the addition of the version you are targeting is essential >> > >> > (3) any proposed change to the syntax should be unequivocally >> > expressed the way syntax is in the original language document, i.e., >> > using EBNF or some such notation, with semantics being expressed >> > in clear English, >> > >> > (4) a proposal for a change should outline the pros and cons, providing >> > use cases and the sound rationale, based on experience and a >> > solid knowledge of programming languages. >> > >> > Clearly, to change a programming language that has been around >> > for several (more than five) years, with widespread acceptance in >> > industry and dozens of tools basing their implementation on the >> > established specs, in a fundamental aspect, even if it be a single >> > operator, is ludicrous. As you have written that you aren't looking >> > for a response, or expecting a wholehearted no, this raises the >> > additional question: cui bono? You've just wasted the time of the >> > people following the list. >> > >> > -W >> > >> > On 01/08/2014, L2L 2L emanuelallen@xxxxxxxxxxx >> > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I feel that cause of the use of attribute using the equal sign, there >> >> should >> >> be a change... Or add on that will replace the equal sign in both xPath >> >> and >> >> xQuery. To test in a predicated if two nodes are equal; this to my >> >> opinion >> >> should be use == and for a deeper test this ===. >> >> >> >> Thank you for reading. I'm not looking for a respond... Since it'll be >> >> a no. >> >> I'm just voicing my opinion on the matter... So please to respond on >> >> telling >> >> why not. Don't feel like reading anymore denial. >> >> >> >> Thank you for reading. >> >> >> >> E-S4L >> > >> > > XSL-List info and archive > EasyUnsubscribe (by email) -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :) ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and =, Bridger Dyson-Smith | Thread | Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and =, Geert Bormans geert@ |
Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and =, Bridger Dyson-Smith | Date | Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and =, Geert Bormans geert@ |
Month |