Subject: Re: [xsl] An observation on the performance of fn:transform From: "Norman Tovey-Walsh ndw@xxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:01:28 -0000 |
Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We currently honour cache="yes" in all cases provided that no static > parameters are supplied. If there are static parameters, we don't > attempt to check that they are consistent with previous uses, we just > bypass the cache. Ah. That explains why it had no effect. Ibm passing two static parameters. One I could eliminate, but the other is a debug flag and I think it would be unfortunate to lose that one. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> https://nwalsh.com/ > Klein bottle for rent; enquire within. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] An observation on the per, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] An observation on the per, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Re: [xsl] An observation on the per, Norman Tovey-Walsh n | Date | Re: [xsl] An observation on the per, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |