Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, with XSLT 3.0 and xsl:variable From: "Mukul Gandhi mukulg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:44:28 -0000 |
Hi Ken, On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:02b/PM G. Ken Holman g.ken.holman@xxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So when you say: > > > It seems to me that, XSLT 1.0's "result tree fragment" (before > > being serialized to the output XML) is a well-formed XML fragment. > > ... I don't agree it is a well-formed XML fragment. I agree with you. An XSLT 1.0 "result tree fragment" can be a sequence of XML element nodes that don't have an outer XML element. In this case, the "result tree fragment" is not a well-formed XML fragment. But its possible that, a "result tree fragment" can be a proper well-formed XML fragment. I think, it'll be better, if we call simply as XSLT 1.0 "result tree fragment", which before its serialized is just an XML fragment which when made available into the final serialized XML is actually is useful to the user. My actual point though, for this thread was, distinction between XSLT 1.0's "result tree fragment" and XSLT 3.0's equivalent sequence constructor. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, G. Ken Holman g.ken. | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Graydon graydon@xxxx |
Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, G. Ken Holman g.ken. | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Graydon graydon@xxxx |
Month |