Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, with XSLT 3.0 and xsl:variable From: "Mukul Gandhi mukulg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:05:11 -0000 |
Hi Wendell, On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:09b/PM Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) wendell.piez@xxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The essential difference is that you were not allowed in *unextended* XSLT > 1.0 to treat the fragment like a tree. In 2.0 you were invited to do so. > I think, its certainly more useful as an XSLT language, to treat the fragment like a tree by default (as you rightly wrote). This helps us solve, more kinds of XML transformation use cases, with the standard XSLT language (2.0 and 3.0). -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Michael Kay michaelk |
Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Michael Kay michaelk |
Month |