Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, with XSLT 3.0 and xsl:variable From: "Mukul Gandhi mukulg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 14:43:42 -0000 |
Hi Graydon, On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 7:37b/PM Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I seem to recall that result tree fragments were an awkward special > case and I had to keep writing out intermediate files if I wanted to do > any kind of multi-pass processing with 1.0. > I think, XSLT 1.0 result tree fragments can be converted into node sets (using node-set extension function, supported by almost all the XSLT 1.0 processors), and then we could easily use those node sets to do multi pass XSLT transformations without persisting intermediate files. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Graydon graydon@xxxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe |
Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Martin Honnen martin | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT result tree fragment, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe |
Month |