Subject: Re: In The News/Penn State From: "Intellectual Property Virtual Scholar" <ipscholar@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:31:56 -0500 |
Here is another news item about the students at Penn State and the disconnection of their Internet services: http://www.post-gazette.com/localnews/20030422pennstate0422p5.asp It is nearly identical to the verion Olga circulated in an earlier message. The upshot: A major university is acting aggressively in reaction to notices of infringement received from copyright owners. The notice-and- takedown provisions (Section 512) that were part of the DMCA created an opportunity for owners to make their formal claims to service providers. The providers need to "expeditiously" remove or "disable access" to the material in order to have the protection from liability that the law offers. We can see from the Penn State example that a service provider is likely simply to disable the user's connection to the network entirely in order to "disable access." Consequently, the user loses all access--even all clearly lawful uses. According to the news item, the students will regain access when any infringements are removed. The statute is filled with nuance, procedures, and protections, but the practical reality is that we will often see it implemented with the delicacy of a sledge hammer. Kenny Crews http://www.umuc.edu/distance/odell/cip/ip_scholar_crews.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Ohio, Deborah_Showalter-Jo | Thread | Re: question on use/DVD to VHS, Intellectual Propert |
RE: Security-conference gag order (, Brian Geoghegan | Date | Re: question on use/DVD to VHS, Intellectual Propert |
Month |