Subject: RE: showing rental videos From: "McDonald, David" <dmcdonald@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:26:31 -0500 |
Isn't this begging the question a little? This isn't a fair use if you're planning to show the entire film in class. I think a lot of people see this situation as gray. The question on the surface is: Is it legal to show a rental tape in the classroom? Of course it is. For years we been showing rented films, video, etc., from commercial distributors like Swank, Canyon, etc., in order to have access to things we don't own, or when we can't justify the purchase. Those materials are made available by the distributors specifically for this purpose. The rental fee for 'Trainspotting' from a commercial rental house is going to be higher than the $3.99 from Blockbuster. Why? Because it includes a license to show the entire film in the classroom. If you intend to show it in another context, say a film forum, the license will be for public performance with a still higher fee. The real question here is: 'Is the copyright statement on the rental store video or DVD valid when it says 'Not intended for public performance' or 'For private home viewing only'? I've always thought so, and I usually recommend our faculty avoid using rental store videos for in class viewing. David McDonald, Special Assistant Office of the Provost Towson University 8000 York Rd. Towson MD 21252-1000 PH: 410-704-4488 FAX: 410-704-3129
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: showing rental videos, John Ruttner | Thread | RE: showing rental videos, M. Claire Stewart |
Re: showing rental videos, John Ruttner | Date | RE: showing rental videos, M. Claire Stewart |
Month |