Re: E-Reserves question

[Chris Holobar <jch4@xxxxxxx>]

Kevin, an interesting argument - one that I hadn't considered. Section 
108 (f)(4) also states that "Nothing in this section  in any way 
affects the right of fair use as provided by section 107, or any 
contractual obligations assumed at any time by the library or archives 
when it obtained a copy or phonorecord of a work in its collections," 
which would seem to privilege the provisions of 107 over 108. Perhaps 
the status of an e-reserve made from an ILL article as a copy of a copy 
of a (presumably purchased) copy would play a role, but I wonder whether 
a compelling argument against an otherwise fair use would turn on this 
question. Interesting to speculate.


Chris



On 8/31/2011 2:00 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Let me be a devil's advocate here for a moment.
>
> Regardless of whether or not the CONTU "suggestion of five" is followed,
> section 108 of the copyright law itself, in the subsection that allows ILL
> copying of articles, requires that "the copy... becomes the property of the
> user, and the library or archives has had no notice that the copy would be
> used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship or research."
>
> It seems to me that you could argue the question of whether placing an article
> obtained through ILL on reserve violates this provision or not either way.
> Perhaps making additional copies for e-reserve still falls into the purpose of
> private study, etc.  But you could also argue that the emphasis on the
> individual recipient earlier in the sentence indicates that "private" was
> meant to refer to the study and research of that individual and no one else.
>
> If one takes the latter view, than the original copy may seem unauthorized,
> and the fair use argument as a whole (for the e-reserve use) is dramatically
> weakened.
>
> Kevin L. Smith, M.L.S., J.D.
> Director of Scholarly Communications
> Duke University, Perkins Library
> P.O. Box 90193
> Durham, NC 27708
> 919-668-4451
> kevin.l.smith@xxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Holobar [mailto:jch4@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:50 PM
> To: digital-copyright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: E-Reserves question
>
> Scott, the "rule of five" was suggested by the CONTU guidelines in the 1970s
> and has become standard practice in many institutions, but it's not law.  At
> any rate, your ILL dept. is probably keeping track of that.  If you're
> conducting a fair use analysis, then the fact that these articles were
> obtained through ILL probably doesn't matter all that much, and it certainly
> isn't determinative.  That your faculty member or institution didn't purchase
> the work(s) may weigh, slightly, against a finding of fair use based on factor
> four (effect on the market for the works), but if the articles meet reasonable
> tests for the other factors (nature of the use, nature of the works, amount of
> the works), then they may well fall within fair use.
>
> Chris
>
> On 8/31/2011 12:57 PM, Laroi Lawton wrote:
> > Scott:
> > The law strongly recommends that I.L.L. departments follow "Rule of 5"
> > guidelines. Each calendar year, an I.L.L. department is allowed to
> > borrow a set number of articles from the most recent 5 years of one
> > journal title. Once the limit is reached, articles can still be
> > obtained from a copyright vendor for a fee.
> >
> > Secondly, and I am sure someone else will correct me on this First, to
> > archive materials not held by the library without permission and/or
> > payment of royalties would be a violation of copyright as it would be
> > considered "systematic copying".
> >
> > The faculty member in your scenario want to put 11 articles obtained
> > from ILL on E-reserves. Many campus libraries limit the amount of
> > articles either owned or not by the library that a faculty member can put on
> E-Reserves as well.
> > Basically The electronic copying and scanning of copyright-protected
> > works for library reserve service are still debated and unsettled
> > areas of the law which may be addressed by the Courts or in future revisions
> of the copyright law.
> > I would check with your policy statements in this venue and work it
> > from there.
> >
> > LaRoi Lawton
> > Assistant Professor
> > Library&   Learning Resources
> > Bronx Community College
> > 2155 University Avenue
> > Bronx, NY 10453
> > Laroi.lawton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 718.289.5348; 718.289.6471(fax)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: scottd@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:scottd@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:25 PM
> > To: digital-copyright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: E-Reserves question
> >
> > Faculty member wants to put 11 articles obtained from ILL on E-Reserves.
> > What are your thoughts on this?  Fair use or not?
> > --
> > David A. Scott
> > Access Services Librarian
> > Ferris Library for Information Technology&   Education
> > Office:  FLITE 140-D
> > 1010 Campus Drive, Big Rapids, MI  49307-2279
> > ph: (231) 591-3540 fax: (231) 591-2662 scottd@xxxxxxxxxx
> --
>
> "I wouldn't want to live without strong misgivings." - John Yossarian
>
> Chris Holobar
> 102 Pattee
> Penn State University
> 814-865-1886
> jch4@xxxxxxx

--

"I wouldn't want to live without strong misgivings." - John Yossarian

Chris Holobar
102 Pattee
Penn State University
814-865-1886
jch4@xxxxxxx