Subject: Re: [stella] Re: vcs.h From: KirkIsrael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: 11 Jul 2002 11:52:03 -0000 |
[snip] > The Stella Programmer's Guide dates from 1979, and clearly lists names for a > majority of the registers. By the above rules, those names should take > absolute priority over all others in use. We will all understand them, and > we should all use them. Registers which are not defined in that document, [...] > I was given a lot of help by the people on this list. In return, I will be > delighted to help others where I can. But, and here's the rub, I expect to > have certain standards in place (..."by which people are able to communicate > and understand each other without having first to learn the > terminology..."). If somebody submits code and asks for help - and that > code does NOT adhere to our commonly used and/or agreed standards - then I > am much much less likely to help. > > Perhaps we should form a [stella] list sanctioned "official" vcs.h register > naming committee. I do not believe embedding VCS.H inside your source is a > good way to go - it presupposes a single source file, which is not always > the case. If we had a standard [stella] VCS.H then I would use it - even if > some of the names weren't the ones I was used to. I'm definately in favor of the status quo (in terms of programs usually including a standardish VCS.H--not the status quo of not having a definitive standard for that file.) Ideally this effort to make a canonical VCS.H should pick up where the last one left off...currently I'm a bit swamped time wise, but if someone was up to checking out the archives, I'd support them (might even put in a plug for the canonical VCS.H in "2600 101", explaining the value of coding against a single standard.) I remember grabbing an incorrect VCS.H early on, one that didn't have INTIM. I (somewhat) humbly submit that once we have a canonical version most people are happy with, the Dig should remove or at least *clearly* mark as "deprecated" all the other VCS.H on the Docs page...having 4 or 5 listed there and all given equal weight is counter-productive... (at very most we should have two, one fully annotated and one minimal, but I think it would be fine to just have the one fully annotated, since the file ain't *that* big, and you don't have to look at the comments once the vcs.h is sitting in the directory.) -- KirkIsrael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://kisrael.com "Whatcha doin'?" "Looking for frogs." "How come?" "I must obey the inscrutable exhortatons of my soul." "Ah. But of course." "My mandate also includes weird bugs." --Hobbes and Calvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Re: vcs.h, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: [stella] Re: vcs.h, Manuel Polik |
Re: [stella] Re: vcs.h, Thomas Jentzsch | Date | Re: [stella] Re: vcs.h, Manuel Polik |
Month |