Subject: Re: [stella] tia hue luminance From: "Eric Ball" <ericball@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:33:47 -0500 |
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Thomas Jentzsch wrote: > > Could you do the same for PAL too? > > Adam wrote: > Yes, if you have equations for me. I've had a look at the PAL format and it looks like the RGB <-> YUV equations are the same, so the only changes would be in the COLU -> YUV equations. Y is still going to be a simple multiplication (although probably a different multiplier) and again the saturation will be some constant value around 0.2143 (which is the size of the colorburst). The hue, though, is kinda different. $c4 = int($colu /16); if (($c4 < 0x02) || ($c4 > 0x0D)) { $sat = 0.0; $yp = $ypmult2 * ($colu & 0x0F); } else { $sat = $defaultsat; $yp = $ypmult * ($colu & 0x0F); } if (($c4 & 0x01) == 0x00) { $hue = 180.0 - ($c4 - 2.0) * $phasescale + $phaseshift; } else { $hue = 180.0 + ($c4 - 1.0) * $phasescale + $phaseshift; } $hue = $hue * $PI / 180.0; With the default value of $phasescale being 15.0. > > Adam wrote: > If you're bothering with PAL equations, can you dig up SECAM equations too? SECAM appears to be a simple binary RGB based on the LM output pins. Nothing tricky there except to figure out a decent magnitude. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] tia hue luminance, Adam Wozniak | Thread | Re: [stella] tia hue luminance, Adam Wozniak |
Re: [stella] tia hue luminance, ecwilkso | Date | Re: [stella] tia hue luminance, Adam Wozniak |
Month |