Subject: Re: [stella] Cybertech board manufacturing From: Chris Wilkson <ecwilkso@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 00:55:45 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Rob wrote: > On Sunday 29 February 2004 17:59, Oliver Achten wrote: > > But why do you bother? No one will ever uses these opcodes > > anyway, because it is too dangerous. > > I suppose, if you consider the authors of about half the homebrew > games out there "no one"... No, there are differences between undocumented and unstable opcodes. I forget the mnemonics for examples offhand...Thomas's favorite instruction (is it LAX?) is undocumented, but stable. The thing that was recently tested (need a little help remembering) was listed as unstable, and that was verified. The unstable instructions rely on the state of the bus, ie what happened outside the 6502. The undocumented commands are things that weren't explicitly designed as part of the instruction set, but they only depend on internal register values and will always give the same operation. These usually result from the microcode partially decoding the opcode for 2 or more "real" instructions. -Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Thread | Re: [stella] Cybertech board manufa, John Saeger | |
Date | Re: [stella] Re: A/V mods, Chris Wilkson | |
Month |