|
Subject: Re: [stella] Generic kernal or just build a game? From: Manuel Rotschkar <cybergoth@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:07:49 +0200 |
Just had some more thoughts about playfield destruction. When you have the PF refelected like this:
PF0 PF1 PF2 PF2 PF1 PF0 u r u r u r
So if you use PF1 and PF2 _only_, you have "r u" repeating twice! That means, you should get away with one 16 byte AND table, starting reversed:
disintigratetab
.byte %11111110
.byte %11111101
.byte %11111011
.byte %11110111
.byte %11101111
.byte %11011111
.byte %10111111
.byte %01111111
.byte %01111111
.byte %10111111
.byte %11011111
.byte %11101111
.byte %11110111
.byte %11111011
.byte %11111101
.byte %11111110LDA xpos LSR LSR ; divide by 4 SEC SBC #$04 ; skip PF0 AND #$0F ; limit to our table range TAX LDA disintigratetab,X
x.##.. .####. ###### .####. ..##..
y.##.. .####. #####x .####. ..##..
Greetings, Manuel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [stella] Generic kernal or just, stella | Thread | Re: [stella] Generic kernal or just, Manuel Rotschkar |
| Re: OT: patch , Dasm WAS: [stella] , KirkIsrael | Date | Re: [stella] Generic kernal or just, Manuel Rotschkar |
| Month |