On 8/23/05, Glenn Saunders <mos6507@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If Stellalist is going to go "elite" then it is
> against the original intention of the list.
>
> Why?
>
> You know what happens when 2600 programming takes
> place in a vacuum?
>
> Look at the new titles on Flashback 2.
Haven't seen the new titles.
But there's "elite", in a positive sense of urging people to a high
standard, which I think is fair for [stella] to aim for...it's not the
same as "exclusionary"...it's open to all, it's patient with
newcomers.
I think for [stella] to maintain its focus on "traditional" assembly
programming rather than embracing a new still emerging and developing
high level language is reasonable.
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
