Re: [stella] stella charter

Subject: Re: [stella] stella charter
From: Kirk Israel <kirkjerk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 23:23:57 -0400
On 8/23/05, Glenn Saunders <mos6507@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If Stellalist is going to go "elite" then it is
> against the original intention of the list.
> Why?
> You know what happens when 2600 programming takes
> place in a vacuum?
> Look at the new titles on Flashback 2.

Haven't seen the new titles.

But there's "elite", in a positive sense of urging people to a high
standard, which I think is fair for [stella] to aim's not the
same as "exclusionary"'s open to all, it's patient with

I think for [stella] to maintain its focus on "traditional" assembly
programming rather than embracing a new still emerging and developing
high level language is reasonable.
Archives (includes files) at
Unsub & more at

Current Thread