Subject: Re: ANN: Evaluation Version of RenderX XSL FO Formatter From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 23:57:45 +0100 (BST) |
I do not want to appear ungrateful, but I wish RenderX had not done this. Offering the world a nice tool based on an old draft of the spec is, IMHO, a mistake. Waiting until it supported the current spec would have been much better. I'd like to recommend RenderX's product to TEI people, as it plainly does the job, but since my TEI XSL FO stylesheets refer to the current spec, it is effectively useless.... Which of the two scenarios is better? a) people like the thing, get stuck into it, and we start having these nonsensical conversations about "oh you mean *that* draft of the language" b) no-one uses it, as the language it implements isn't currently documented, and RenderX fail to get the feedback they deserve Sebastian Rahtz XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
ANN: Evaluation Version of RenderX , Nikolai Grigoriev | Thread | RE: ANN: Evaluation Version of Rend, David Tolpin |
Re: Mozilla. Re: Netscape Support f, Keith Visco | Date | Re: ANN: Evaluation Version of Rend, Nikolai Grigoriev |
Month |