Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc different

Subject: Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc differently
From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:23:23 +0100 (BST)

On Fri, 26 May 2000, Miloslav Nic wrote:

> I just run to this.
> 
> By now I thought that //foo is an abbrev form of /descendant::foo

/descendant-or-self::foo

-- 
<Matt/>

Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: Context node/Predicates in Expressions, (continued) Mike Brown - Fri, 26 May 2000 00:34:09 -0600 (MDT) Miloslav Nic - Fri, 26 May 2000 10:00:20 +0200 David Carlisle - Fri, 26 May 2000 09:24:51 +0100 (BST) Miloslav Nic - Fri, 26 May 2000 15:03:27 +0200 Matt Sergeant - Fri, 26 May 2000 10:23:23 +0100 (BST) <= Matt Sergeant - Fri, 26 May 2000 11:31:42 +0100 (BST) David Carlisle - Fri, 26 May 2000 12:08:01 +0100 (BST) John Robert Gardner - Fri, 26 May 2000 12:44:22 -0400 (EDT) Mike Brown - Fri, 26 May 2000 11:01:51 -0600 (MDT)

Current Thread

Re: Context node/Predicates in Expressions, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Miloslav Nic	Thread	Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Matt Sergeant
RE: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Bjorn Boxstart	Date	re: mixed content styling problem, Bill dehOra
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home