<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc differently

Subject: Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc differently
From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:31:42 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:

> On Fri, 26 May 2000, Miloslav Nic wrote:
> 
> > I just run to this.
> > 
> > By now I thought that //foo is an abbrev form of /descendant::foo
> 
> /descendant-or-self::foo

Damnit, I meant of course: /descendant-or-self::node()/foo

Must drink more coffee before responding to emails.

-- 
<Matt/>

Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Matt Sergeant Thread Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, David Carlisle
re: mixed content styling problem, Bill dehOra Date Re: How would you add depth to this, Jeni Tennison
Month