| 
 
Subject: Re: Context node/Predicates in Expressions From: John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 12:44:22 -0400 (EDT)  | 
On Fri, 26 May 2000, David Carlisle wrote: > Since all elements are the child of some node, this last clause doesn't > make any extra restriction in this case. > > In general a node, x, is matched by a pattern match="p" if there exists a > node, N, in the source tree, such that if you took N as the context node > then x would be in the node set returned by select="p". > David- I missed somehting here. "node x" happens to be matchable by 'match="p"' because hte node x you are thinking of has the element type name of "p", right? just want to be sure I got this. jr XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
 
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, Mike Brown | 
| RE: Matching Attributes with @, John Robert Gardner | Date | RE: How to escape character when us, Hien Luu | 
| Month |