Subject: Re: Best way to handle multiple string replacements? From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 10:07:47 -0400 |
David Carlisle wrote: > > But latex can handle that range by default, just enable latin1 encoding > (which is the same as unicode in this range) There is no need to replace > those characters by command sequences. I'm using Thomas Esser's TeTex distribution. The latex app doesn't give me any errors when processing the ``high'' characters, but they don't show up in the DVI or Postscript output. I'm not sure if this is a problem with latex or my font setup. As the macros do work, I assume it is with latex. Is the ability to handle these characters properly something that must be set at compile time? An environment variable? Command line options? Some package? > Incidentally, does anyone know what the LaTeX macro for ¶ > (pilcrow sign = paragraph sign) is? > \P and \textparagraph apparently. Thanks. -- Warren Hedley Department of Engineering Science Auckland University New Zealand XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Best way to handle multiple str, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Best way to handle multiple str, David Carlisle |
Re: Xpath AndExpr on attribute valu, Mike Brown | Date | Is Xalan C++ really that slow?, Mack, Daniel |
Month |