Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:30:01 -0000 |
> do you use xt:node-set() or saxon:line-number() ? Since I know the > answer is yes, I'm not sure what you have against evil-empire:script? In 1.1 I will have xsl:node-set () equivalent. In 1.1 I will have xsl:document() I recognise my need (in 3 places) for saxon:line-number() and would support its addition to the base language as a case in point. Its the idea of any non xsl vocab inside my stylesheet that I object to. > > > I had my last mail quarantined, > so it's not just me. I wrote to postmaster@... and complained. > Why are they puuting xsl in quarantine? <grin>My guess? Because I used x x x as a dummy namespace</grin> I wonder if this will get through? > > > Bring the common ones into mainstream XSL > > and keep out scripting. > but waiting for XSLT version n+1 will always be too slow. for some folk, agreed. I'm more patient. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node e, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node e, David Carlisle |
Month |