Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:12:57 GMT
> I recognise my need (in 3 places) for saxon:line-number() and 
> would support its addition to the base language as a case in point.

ah, so that's the criterion, only extensions that you've used should be
let in:-)

>  Its the idea of any non xsl vocab inside my stylesheet that I
> object to.

I don't really think there is much special about the distinction of
being in the same file. If it's some script inside an msxml:script
element or an extension function accessed via a java: URI pointing at
some class that is hopefully on my java classpath, the effect is the
same: it will either work or it won't depending on circumstances.
So I don't see stylesheets using msxml:script as any less portable than
an xsl 1.0 stylesheet using the XSL engine's current java binding to
an extension function.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread