Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Examples please From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:03:28 GMT |
> fukcoded as just the kind of bick "processor case switch" that I showed, > wither using xsl:choose or xsl:fallback, depending on th ecase. even by my standards that appears to be unreadable. try coded as just the kind of big "processor case switch" that I showed, whether using xsl:choose or xsl:fallback, depending on the case. _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Exampl, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Exampl, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, David Carlisle |
Month |