Subject: Re: [xsl] catching the last node still satisfying a condition From: "Dimitar Peikov" <mitko@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:10:38 +0300 |
Exactly, but I've cant find the right words. Sorry for misunderstanding. The result is quite the same, isn't it? > > You can't without for-each cycle. because [] operands return > > 1 recordset not > > an array. > > eh??? > > A filter expression using [] returns neither a recordset nor an array, it > returns a node-set. > > Mike Kay > > -- Dimitar Peikov Programmer Analyst Globalization Group "We Build e-Business" RILA Solutions 27 Building, Acad.G.Bonchev Str. 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria phone: (+359 2) 9797320 phone: (+359 2) 9797300 fax: (+359 2) 9733355 http://www.rila.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] catching the last node st, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] catching the last node st, Guillaume Rousse |
RE: [xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V3 #1, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] forward references from n, Graham Seaman |
Month |