Re: [xsl] CDATA block to node set.

Michael Kay wrote:

But it still begs the question:
the purpose of
CDATA is to say "the stuff in here isn't markup", so if it
is markup, why are you putting it in CDATA?

Because I would like to parse my language for validity.
A reasonable objective; but the effect of your decision is that the XML
inside the CDATA isn't even parsed for well-formedness.

That is correct. I will have to accept potential runtime errors.

Morten

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] CDATA block to node set., (continued) Morten Primdahl - Thu, 09 May 2002 22:31:44 +0200 Michael Kay - Thu, 9 May 2002 23:26:05 +0100 Morten Primdahl - Fri, 10 May 2002 00:51:07 +0200 Michael Kay - Fri, 10 May 2002 08:29:31 +0100 Morten Primdahl - Fri, 10 May 2002 12:18:02 +0200 <= J.Pietschmann - Fri, 10 May 2002 20:41:28 +0200 Mike Brown - Thu, 9 May 2002 14:02:40 -0600 (MDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] CDATA block to node set., Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] CDATA block to node set., J.Pietschmann
RE: [xsl] Carlos Problem (II) how t, TSchutzerWeissmann	Date	Re: [xsl] Re: Re: What do we have i, Roma Yankin
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home