RE: [xsl] Document() and &

Subject: RE: [xsl] Document() and &
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 07:35:30 +0100
> On the other hand, the version of Xalan 1 that I tried 
> claimed that the url was malformed, and that's wrong.  That's a bug.
> So you need to determine whether the operation fails because 
> an html file is not well-formed, or because the xslt 
> processor has a problem with the url syntax - which would be 
> a bug because that syntax is correct.

Technically not a bug but a restriction: it's entirely up to the XSLT
implementor to decide what forms of URL are supported.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread