Subject: RE: [xsl] testing for following siblings From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 07:42:28 +0100 |
> Another confusion ... I'm trying to determine when the > current node has no following siblings. One expression that > seems to work is: > > not(following-sibling::*) > > but the following expressions don't "work", and I thought they would > > following-sibling::* = '' That will be true if there is a following-sibling and its string value is "". > following-sibling::* = '/..' > That will be true if there is a following sibling whose string value is the same as the string value of a node in the node-set "/..". Since the node-set "/.." is always empty, this will never be true. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] how to access values of d, Mike Brown | Thread | [xsl] server mime types, Joel Konkle-Parker |
RE: [xsl] Document() and &, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] newbie question about usi, Michael Kay |
Month |