RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper

[DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx]

> [I know I'm not the David you mean but...] I'd certainly _expect_ them
> to be broken. fo:inline is "inline" in the sense that an HTML 
> <em> or a
> latex  \textbf{...} is inline, it's used to change some properties of
> the text but the result is still part of the main text flow and takes
> part in line breaking etc.

Yep, can't argue with that logic.
so the inline is styled and added to the parent flow,
and laid out in 'lines' by the formatter.

<fo:inline keep-together.within-line="always">

Being the exception?

Regards David
(just to keep it all familiar :-)

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list