Subject: [xsl] doe alternative? From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:56:07 +0100 |
I want to output <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:comment> <meta> <xsl:copy-of select="@*"/> </meta> </xsl:text> </xsl:otherwise> I have some input which 'may' be needed in the output. Ideally I'd like to have it available in the output, but commented out for manual intervention later. XSLT 1.0 says no! How can I sneak it through Saxon please :-) And why is that rule in place please? Other than nested comments, I can't see any rationale in disallowing it? Regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, Laura Jenkins | Thread | Re: [xsl] doe alternative?, David Carlisle |
[xsl] generalized unique element, Laura Jenkins | Date | Re: [xsl] tag minimisation, David Carlisle |
Month |