Subject: Re: [xsl] doe alternative? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:48:03 +0100 |
MK> you wouldn't expect the XSLT result tree to allow a comment MK> node to contain an element node, would you? ah but apparently he would expect the system to apply its XML output rules on the tree fragment and insert the (a) linearisation into the comment. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] doe alternative?, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] doe alternative?, DPawson |
Re: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] doe alternative?, DPawson |
Month |