|
Subject: Re: [xsl] doe alternative? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:19:46 +0100 |
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:comment>
<meta>
<xsl:apply-templates mode="verb" select="@*"/>
</meta>
</xsl:comment>
</xsl:otherwise>
where the verb mode does a linerisation of the tree, various versions
have been posted I think there's one in your faq, or the archives of
this list or the schematron distrib ...
> Other than nested comments, I can't see any rationale in disallowing it?
It would be a source of incompatibility between stylesheets as it would
expose the XML linearisation to the XSL stylesheet, something not
currently possible.
<xsl:variable name="x">
<xsl:comment>
<meta>
<xsl:apply-templates mode="verb" select="@*"/>
</meta>
</xsl:comment>
</xsl:variable>
If it would be allowed, then string value of $x would be something like
<meta a="2"/>
or
<meta a="2"></meta>
or
<meta
a = '2' ></meta>
depending on how the system linearises XML.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] doe alternative?, DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] doe alternative?, Michael Kay |
| RE: [xsl] doe alternative? Sorry, s, DPawson | Date | RE: [xsl] tag minimisation, Andrew Welch |
| Month |