Subject: Re: [xsl] doe alternative? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:19:46 +0100 |
<xsl:otherwise> <xsl:comment> <meta> <xsl:apply-templates mode="verb" select="@*"/> </meta> </xsl:comment> </xsl:otherwise> where the verb mode does a linerisation of the tree, various versions have been posted I think there's one in your faq, or the archives of this list or the schematron distrib ... > Other than nested comments, I can't see any rationale in disallowing it? It would be a source of incompatibility between stylesheets as it would expose the XML linearisation to the XSL stylesheet, something not currently possible. <xsl:variable name="x"> <xsl:comment> <meta> <xsl:apply-templates mode="verb" select="@*"/> </meta> </xsl:comment> </xsl:variable> If it would be allowed, then string value of $x would be something like <meta a="2"/> or <meta a="2"></meta> or <meta a = '2' ></meta> depending on how the system linearises XML. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] doe alternative?, DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] doe alternative?, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] doe alternative? Sorry, s, DPawson | Date | RE: [xsl] tag minimisation, Andrew Welch |
Month |