Subject: Re: [xsl] A Question **TO** XSLT Newbies From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:45:32 -0400 |
It's important not to forget that Document people had been dealing with this stuff for over a decade before XML.
My thinking about presenting it to procedural programs is to emphasize that essentially the data makes "function calls" to the templates (which is the opposite of how procedural code works, where the program is in charge of flow, in XSLT the data is in charge of flow... my thinking on this is still pretty immature)
Only for the default case, where elements are presented for processing in document order (and I don't see how else it could be written...). Anything else it's XSLT (or rather, the programmer) which is in charge.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] A Question **TO** XSLT Ne, Peter Flynn | Thread | Re: [xsl] A Question **TO** XSLT Ne, Peter Flynn |
[xsl] Deciding a parameter name dyn, Gregory Propf | Date | RE: [xsl] Deciding a parameter name, Sundar Shanmugasunda |
Month |